Continental promo
||  News  ||
 
March 02, 2006

Marriage ban signature irregularities probed in Massachusetts

Prosecutors from Massachusetts attorney general Tom Reilly's office have launched a criminal investigation to determine whether workers gathering support for a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage forged the signatures of some voters last year.

The investigation stems from allegations by some voters that their names were on signature lists despite the fact that they said they never signed the petition. It would not affect the outcome, since supporters had more than twice as many certified signatures as they needed to send the question for legislative approval for the 2008 ballot.

The question would amend the state constitution to ban same-sex marriage, overturning the state's historic court ruling. Massachusetts is the only state to grant marriage equality.

"Because some of these concerns raised allege the crime of forgery, these allegations were referred to our criminal bureau," assistant attorney general Stephanie Lovell said in a letter to secretary of state William Galvin dated Tuesday.

Lovell said investigators from the bureau have "contacted the complaining party to further understand the basis for the allegations." A meeting with activists from MassEquality, a group that supports same-sex marriage, is set to take place this week.

A call to Kris Mineau, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute, the main backer of the amendment, was not immediately returned Tuesday.

Marc Solomon of MassEquality said the group has heard from more than 2,000 people who said they either didn't sign the petition or were tricked into signing it. "People were duped by trained professional signature gatherers," he said.

Lovell was responding to a letter sent to Reilly from Galvin late last week. Galvin said he wanted to report the allegations after receiving complaints from voters.

He said the complaints broke down into two categories. One group was made up of voters who said they had been tricked into signing the anti–marriage equality petition after being told it was an amendment to allow grocery stores to sell wine. The second group of voters said their signatures simply had been forged.

Galvin said that while the number of voters making the allegations wouldn't affect the outcome of the same-sex marriage question, the allegations of forgery are a possible violation of state laws.

At a statehouse hearing last October, supporters and opponents of the anti–marriage equality initiative traded accusations of dirty tricks. Opponents said signature gathers used "bait-and-switch" tactics to dupe voters into signing the question, while supporters said gay rights activists stole blank petitions, defaced others to invalidate signatures, and shoved and spit on signature gatherers.

In November the state senate approved a bill designed to outlaw "bait-and-switch" tactics by paid signature gathers. The bill was sent to the house.

Supporters of the antigay initiative collected more than 170,000 signatures. Of those, 147,000 were certified. They needed only 65,825 certified signatures.

Before it gets on the ballot, the question must win the backing of at least 50 members of the legislature in two successive sessions. (AP)

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Be the first to comment on this story.

Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max. HTML formatting and hyperlinks are NOT permitted.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

More Exclusives
  • View From the Hill: The End of DADT?
    Defense Secretary Robert Gates revealed that lawyers are exploring ways to ease enforcement of the military's gay ban, but cautioned that the law doesn't leave much wiggle room. He need look no further than DOD history for a lesson in altering the policy.
  • Hot Sheet: Week of July 5
    When you get back from that big 4th of July barbecue, unwind with Sacha Baron Cohen's Bruno and your favorite B-movie-mocking, basic cable robots.
  • Hungry Like the Wolf
    A master of viola, ukulele, piano, and harp, Patrick Wolf is a music prodigy -- one who, the night before this interview, spit on a cop and got himself arrested.
  • Soapside: Advocate's Guide to Daytime
    Forbes March talks about playing gay, Otalia fans outraged, update on One Life to Live’s Patricia Maurceri’s firing over gay plot point, Phillip Chancellor III big reveal, and Erica Kane goes to Africa.
  • The Faces of Federal Prop. 8
    With the federal challenge to Prop. 8 moving full speed ahead, Advocate.com sits down with the two couples named as plaintiffs in the suit.
  • Mommy, the Gays Are Coming
    After a year of advancements and celebration for gay and lesbian Colombians, the community takes to the streets of Bogota for the country's biggest pride ever.
  • The Pride of Antwerp
    Advocate.com hits the gay-friendly streets of Antwerp with openly gay police commissioner Serge Muyters.
  • Excerpt: Mean Little Deaf Queer
    In an excerpt from her humorous and harrowing new memoir, Mean Little Deaf Queer, Terry Galloway recalls her early childhood, describing feelings of ugliness, confusion about gender, and being one of the boys.
  • Top Political Blogs
    From Joe.My.God to The Daily Beast, Advocate.com spotlights a few of the best blogs that cover politics, inside and way outside the Beltway.
  • The Diva of French Television
    A hot young screenwriter who has made gay OK for millions of French viewers, Nicolas Mercier sips champagne, dons a feathered hat, and says he wants to see Colin Farrell and Jude Law go at it.