
The all-American Chicago suburb of Crystal Lake may play host to part of the Gay Games after all.
The Games—taking place in and around Chicago this July—proposed a rowing event at Crystal Lake, only to see it rejected by the city's park board members in a 2–2 vote last week. A majority was needed to secure the competition, and park board president Jerry Sullivan, away on vacation for the initial vote, returned on Friday with a promise to approve the Gay Games proposal.
“I think that's something we'd be able to manage without any real inconvenience,” Sullivan told a Chicago-area newspaper. “My gut reaction would be that I most likely would be in favor of it.”
Sullivan, with the support of the two park commissioners who voted to approve the event, called a meeting for Tuesday to reconsider the proposal. “I'm hopeful we get another opportunity to vote on an issue where I think we were incorrect,” said Michael Zellman, one of the commissioners supporting the event. “At the core of this issue is human rights. People need to be aware of that.”
One of the board members who rejected the event was Dave Phelps, who objected to organizations seeking to advance “a person's agenda or sexual preference.” Scott Breeden, the other commissioner who turned down the proposal, said his choice was not based on keeping gay athletes out of Crystal Lake but with giving away access to the lake on a Sunday in July. He expressed surprise at the vitriolic responses to his decision, though, which prompted many angry e-mails.
“This is the most orchestrated, threatening situation I have ever found myself in,” Breeden told the local press. “It turns out that there are certain groups, apparently, you cannot have a disagreement with without being labeled.” (Advocate.com)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.