
Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney said on Monday he's trying to find a way to exempt Roman Catholic social services agencies from a law requiring them to consider gays as adoptive parents. Romney said he doesn't have the power to unilaterally exempt Catholic Charities from the state's antidiscrimination laws. But he said he wants to let Catholic agencies continue placing children with adoptive parents without violating the teachings of their faith.
"The church through its Catholic Charities provides an extraordinary service to the commonwealth by placing many special needs children every year in homes," Romney told reporters. "That's a service I hope we will continue to be able to avail ourselves of." Romney did not elaborate on what options he is exploring. Lt. Gov. Kerry Healey, who is seeking the Republican nomination for governor, broke with Romney last week, saying she's opposed to exempting the church from the antidiscrimination laws.
In the past two decades, 13 of the 720 children placed with adoptive families by Catholic Charities have been placed in gay households. The state's four Catholic bishops have said the state law threatens the church's religious freedom by forcing it to do something it considers immoral.
Seven members of the Catholic Charities board stepped down last Wednesday in protest of the bishops' stance. An eighth board member resigned on Thursday. The 42-member board had voted unanimously in December to continue considering gay households for adoptions.
Romney met in his office Wednesday with church leaders, including Boston archbishop Sean O'Malley, and said religious institutions should be able to help people without violating their faith. "Ultimately, legislation may need to be filed to provide an exemption based on religious principles," Romney said in a statement released after the meeting.
Any legislation seeking to grant the Catholic Church an exemption could face a tough time on Beacon Hill. House speaker Salvatore DiMasi said he supports the state's antidiscrimination law, including the part allowing gay parents to adopt. "The state's top priority should be placing children in loving and caring homes, regardless of adoptive parents' race, ethnicity, and sexual orientation," DiMasi said last week. "Denying same-sex couples the right to be considered is discriminatory and runs counter to the principle that all citizens are created equal under the law."
Arline Isaacson, cochair of the Massachusetts Gay and Lesbian Political Caucus, said she is baffled why the issue is coming up now. "We fought this battle from 1985 to 1991, and the courts settled the question in the early 1990s," she said. "If the Catholic Church had a problem with gay adoptions, the question was resolved over a decade ago. It makes no sense that they are raising it now."
Geri Denterlein, one of the Catholic Charities board members who resigned, said she had no inside knowledge why the bishops asked for the exemption now. "I think it's something related to Rome and how the Vatican is thinking about the United States and gay marriage," she said. (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.