
HIV service providers in the greater Boston and southern New Hampshire region are set to lose nearly $312,000 in federal Ryan White CARE Act funding this year, marking the second consecutive year federal AIDS funding to the area has been cut, according to the Boston Public Health Commission. Last year, BPHC had its federal AIDS funds cut by almost $1.2 million, said commission officials. Ryan White funds are allocated to more than 125 service organizations that provide care and support to nearly 7,000 HIV-positive Boston-area residents.
"Every day people still die of AIDS, and others become newly infected," said Boston mayor Thomas M. Menino in a BPHC press statement. “We need to recognize that thousands of people have come to depend on these services to stay healthy. This funding is crucial for urban areas fighting the AIDS epidemic.”
John Auerback, BPHC executive director, said the Ryan White cuts will hurt the most vulnerable Boston-area HIVers. "However, these cuts will pale in comparison to losses we will face if the proposed changes to the CARE Act are approved at the federal level."
A proposed restructuring of Ryan White funding would change the way federal AIDS relief is allocated. Instead of issuing grants to regions that have the highest number of cumulative AIDS cases since the beginning of the pandemic, funds would be divvied up based on how many HIV patients currently live in a particular area. The revised funding criteria also would include a redrawing of geographic funding regions, with an emphasis on treatment programs. The changes could result in a cut of nearly $9 million in Ryan White funds to the Boston area.
"The CARE Act has worked well in Boston and Massachusetts," said Auerback in a press statement. "We are urging Congress not to undo years of hard work by disinvesting in cities. The proposed changes will push the burden back on the state to preserve the system of care that keeps people healthy and alive." (Advocate.com)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.