An
Iowa senate committee deadlocked Tuesday on a proposed
state constitutional amendment to ban same-sex
marriages, prompting accusations from both parties.
Republicans accused Democrats of blocking debate on
the issue, while Democrats accused the GOP of seeking
political gain by focusing on the marriage issue.
"It saddens me that Republicans have resorted to
playing partisan politics with hot-button social
issues rather than work to find common-ground
solutions to move this state forward," said senate
Democratic leader Michael Gronstal, of Council Bluffs.
Republican senator David Miller countered by saying
Democrats are "stonewalling" debate on same-sex marriages.
With the senate tied at 25–25, both
parties must agree before any issue can proceed. The
senate state government committee planned more debate on
the marriage question Wednesday.
The state already has a law defining marriage as
the union of a man and a woman, but a group of gay
couples has filed a lawsuit challenging that law.
Conservatives argue that the lawsuit demonstrates the
need for a state constitutional amendment banning
same-sex marriage to prevent judges from overturning
state law.
To get a potential amendment on the ballot, it
must be approved by two consecutive general assemblies
and then go on the ballot for the next statewide
election. If lawmakers don't approve a measure this session,
the earliest possible election would be in 2010. (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.