
School districts in Kansas must get parents’ written permission before teaching their children sex education, the state board of education decided Wednesday. The board adopted the policy in a 6–4 vote. Up to now, most Kansas districts had an “opt-out” policy—they enrolled children in sex ed unless a parent objected in writing.
Only a few other states have such “opt-in” requirements on sex education, according to the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States, a group that promotes sex education. Among them: Arizona, Nevada, and Utah.
Board members who voted for the new policy said some parents told them they did not know their children were taking sex education until the classes had started. “It’s about empowering parents. That’s the bottom line,” said board chairman Steve Abrams.
Critics of the measure said that the children whose parents who won’t sign a permission form or won’t turn it in are the ones most likely to need the courses. Some also said that the rule may violate the Kansas constitution, which gives local school boards broad authority.
One board member wants the new policy to go further and require abstinence-only courses. “We need to send the correct message,” Kathy Martin said. Under her proposal, a school could lose its state accreditation if it does not offer nine weeks of instruction on “abstinence until marriage” at least once in grades 6–9.
The board said it would discuss Martin’s proposal at a later meeting.
Wednesday’s vote came less than three weeks after the state senate approved a bill requiring all school districts to continue requiring sex education classes and prohibit them from going to abstinence-only courses. The bill is now before a house committee.
The board had similar regulations in place for nearly two decades, but they expired.
In November, after a debate that attracted worldwide attention, the board adopted standards that treat evolution as a flawed theory. (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.