

The Bedford Diaries, the WB network's latest drama, is all about sexy undergrads—some straight, some experimenting, some possibly gay—taking it off and turning each other on. If it sounds too hot for network TV, it is. Two scenes of the premiere episode set to air Wednesday night have been cut, one being a lusty kiss between two young women.
The network made the edits—the other sliced scene showed a girl shoving her hand down her pants—but the reason for the censorship remains debatable; network brass say it came out of the Federal Communications Commission's recent close monitoring of “explicit” and “indecent” content. Since the cuts were preemptive, though, it's not clear whether the FCC would have defined the gay kiss as “explicit” or “indecent.” A plotline involving an affair between a professor and a student and scenes of graphic sexual discussions remain.
The network, which made the uncut premiere episode available on its Web site, wouldn't officially comment but released the following statement: “The WB takes its responsibility as a broadcast network very seriously, and we have always been mindful of the FCC's indecency rules. While we believe that the previous uncut version of The Bedford Diaries is in keeping with those rules, out of an abundance of caution, we decided to make some additional minor changes to the premiere episode of the series, which is set to debut Wednesday, March 29."
Last week the FCC proposed millions of dollars in fines, mostly against CBS affiliates for showing an episode of Without a Trace that featured a teen orgy. CBS stations also had to pony up $550,000 for flashing Janet Jackson's breast during the 2004 Super Bowl.
Even with the FCC cracking down, gay television producer William Burgess remains skeptical about the WB's Bedford Diaries decision. “Is two girls kissing any more offensive than a man and a woman?" Burgess asked. "What [the WB] is saying is that they think the kissing could possibly be obscene, which is absurd." (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.