
A federally funded analysis of 174 studies on HIV prevention work debunks a long-held belief by conservatives that condom education and distribution programs encourage sexual activity, AIDSmap.com reports. The analysis found the exact opposite—that providing information about condoms in addition to motivational and behavioral outreach actually reduced the frequency of sexual activity more than just motivational and behavioral programs.
Condom information also did not encourage earlier sex among youth, lead to more frequent sexual activity, or lead to more sexual partners among those already sexually active, according to the analysis, performed by researchers at the University of Connecticut and Syracuse University.
The analysis, published in the March edition of the Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, was funded by the National Institutes of Health and examined data from 174 studies that individually chronicled the impact of 206 separate HIV prevention programs from January 1989 to May 2003. More than 115,000 people participated in the prevention programs analyzed.
Right-wing members of the Bush administration, Congress, and abstinence-only sex education programs have long claimed that providing young people with information about condoms—or making condoms available to them—encourages them to have sex. But this analysis “should provide reassurance that increased numbers of sexual partners, larger numbers of partners, and more likely sexual activity are not iatrogenic [unintentional] effects of providing condoms or training in condom use skills and interpersonal negotiation skills,” the researchers wrote. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.