
Although most global researchers estimate the HIV prevalence rate in a country based on the percentage of pregnant women at prenatal clinics found to be HIV-positive, that approach could be producing wildly inaccurate estimates, The Washington Post reports. In Rwanda, for example, the United Nations estimated the HIV prevalence rate to be 13%, but a new nationwide HIV survey shows that among residents ages 15 to 49 the rate is actually about 3%. Some groups had claimed Rwanda’s rate was as high as 30%.
Researchers say using data from prenatal clinics results doesn’t reflect the true nature of the disease in a country. The estimates were skewed in favor of young, sexually active women in areas with prenatal clinics, typically larger cities. Nation-by-nation surveys have shown that these urban areas have much higher HIV rates than a country’s general population.
These statistical modeling approaches have greatly overestimated the spread of the disease in eastern and western Africa, they say. But the estimates are much more accurate in southern Africa, where HIV’s impact is far greater than in other parts of the continent, according to researchers. HIV prevalence rates are alarmingly high in South Africa, Botswana, Swaziland, and Zimbabwe.
In Botswana numerous studies have shown that about 35% of the nation’s adults are HIV-positive; in Francistown, Botswana’s second-largest city, nearly 45% of men and 70% of women ages 30 to 34 are infected. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.