Logo explains why it rejected UCC's "Ejector" ad  | Entertainment News | Advocate.com

||  Entertainment News  ||
April 14, 2006
Logo explains why it rejected UCC's "Ejector" ad

Most media watchers didn't bat an eye when major networks like ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox, and Telemundo recently rejected a United Church of Christ commercial depicting a gay couple being ejected from their pew of an intolerant church. Heads did turn, though, when gay and lesbian network Logo told UCC last week it was also refusing to run the commercial. 

A statement released Thursday by MTV Networks, the Viacom-owned parent company of Logo, read: "MTV Networks does not accept advocacy or religious advertising that appears to disparage any organization, denomination, or individual. This policy applies to all MTV Networks's channels, which include MTV, VH1, Comedy Central, Logo, CMT, and Nickelodeon. The UCC ad did not meet MTV Networks' standards for paid commercial advertising.

"At Logo, we know that LGBT people of faith are as diverse in their religious beliefs as we are as a community. Logo will continue to develop and air programs that explore themes about LGBT people of faith with incisiveness and authenticity. From Latter Days to Trembling Before G-d, Logo will continue developing and airing programs that address the full experiences of LGBT people of faith."

While Logo turned down the UCC commercial, titled "Ejector," gay-oriented cable channels Q Television and Here agreed to run the ads for free as public-service announcements, because they approved of its inclusive message toward diverse Christians. Mainstream cable networks like CNN and A&E are also running the spots, though as paid advertising.

An earlier UCC commercial was turned down by major networks in December 2004. (The Advocate)

Do you agree with Logo's position? Disagree? The Advocate is compiling a forum of reader opinions on Logo's decision not to air the UCC ad. Please send your opinion to letters@advocate.com. Comments received before 5 p.m. EDT on Friday, April 14, will be considered for an exclusive forum to be posted on The Advocate's site this weekend.

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Be the first to comment on this story.

Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.