
The Illinois supreme court has reinstated a life sentence for a man convicted in the 1988 decapitation of a 23-year-old gay man from Murphysboro. The court on Thursday reversed a fifth district appellate court's decision to reduce Richard C. Nitz's sentence to 60 years.
"It has been a long 18-year battle with Mr. Nitz," said Williamson County state's attorney Charles Garnati. "He will spend the rest of his days and die in prison, which is where he belongs."
Authorities have said Nitz beat Michael Miley unconscious with a baseball bat in Williamson County and then drove him to a remote area in Union County where he shot Miley in the head before decapitating him. Miley's body was found April 6, 1988.
Nitz initially was sentenced to death for the murder, but he appealed his 1996 conviction and was granted a new trial. That trial ended with his conviction on one of three counts of first-degree murder. He was acquitted on the two other counts. Authorities have said the attack was motivated by Nitz's hatred of gay people.
The Illinois supreme court ordered the appellate court in 2004 to determine if a jury would have found beyond a reasonable doubt that the murder "was accompanied by brutal and heinous behavior indicative of wanton cruelty." In reaching its opinion, the appellate court relied on documents from the second trial that contained statements from a juror who said she doubted Nitz's guilt and reluctantly voted to convict because she thought he would be eligible for a more lenient sentence.
But the supreme court said in its opinion that while the testimony doesn't support wanton cruelty because Miley already was dead when he was decapitated, it is "cold-blooded to sever and conceal a victim's head." "While it does not indicate wanton cruelty, it does indicate brutality," the opinion said. "Thus, the evidence supports a finding that the defendant's crime was, at the least, brutal." (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.