

Gay-rights
advocates in Colorado have failed to block a ballot measure
that aims to prohibit domestic partnerships, after a state
board approved the ballot measure’s language on
Thursday. The measure asks voters to forbid legal
recognition of a union that is “similar to that of
marriage.” It’s a counter-attack on a
domestic-partnership measure already on the ballot.
Gay-rights lawyers made a case that the language
is “purposefully obscure” and voters may
wonder how it would apply to common-law marriage. The
same lawyers successfully fought the anti-gay rights
Amendment 2 a decade ago but failed in this attempt.
The measure’s co-sponsor, state
representative Kevin Lundberg, called their arguments
“absurd.” He plans to start collecting the
required signatures to place the measure on the
ballot, even though gay-rights advocates plan to
appeal to the state Supreme Court.
This could be the start of protracted legal
battles in Colorado. Two other measures dealing with
same-sex marriage—one for and one against—are
also expected to land on the ballot this fall. (Sirius OutQ
News)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.