
A number of gay and lesbian candidates overcame vicious attacks by well-funded antigay challengers on Tuesday to either win their elections or advance to a runoff. The Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund, the nation's largest gay and lesbian political action committee, announced that eight of its endorsed candidates were victorious on Tuesday, adding to the 11 wins the group tallied earlier this year.
"Increasingly, fairness trumps fear," said Chuck Wolfe, president and CEO of the Victory Fund. "Our candidates are winning because voters understand they care about issues that matter to them. Our successful candidates provide a compelling vision for advancing public policy on a wide range of issues voters care about, and ultimately that's what resonates with the voter—not whether or not the candidate is gay or lesbian."
One of the goals of the Victory Fund has been adding out gay and lesbian elected officials in state legislatures where there are currently none—an effort the group refers to as the "Legislative Horizon States" campaign. Three candidates have advanced to help the organization move closer to that goal:
-- In Alabama Tuesday, Patricia Todd fended off a last-minute smear campaign in order to make it to a July 13 runoff for a state legislature seat in a Birmingham district.
-- Matt McCoy won his primary in Iowa Tuesday night to defend his legislative seat in November even after repeated attacks from a "family values" opponent. This is McCoy's first race as an openly gay candidate.
-- Kathy Webb won her Democratic primary May 23 for a seat in the Arkansas state legislature. She is poised to become the first openly LGBT legislator in the state’s history.
"Other legislators respond to the courage and commitment demonstrated by their openly gay and lesbian colleagues," said Wolfe. "It's harder to be intolerant toward those you know and work with every day."
A recent Zogby poll conducted for the Gay and Lesbian Leadership Institute found that more than 70% of respondents would vote for an openly gay or lesbian candidate for state legislature if the candidate shared their views on the issues.
The following is a list of additional wins reported by the Victory Fund:
-- Ken Yeager won a seat on the Santa Clara County, Calif., board of supervisors outright with more than 50% of the vote in a field of three candidates.
-- Kevin Dowling was reelected to the Hayward, Calif., city council.
-- David Rubin was elected superior court judge in San Diego.
-- Richard Gordon was reelected to the San Mateo County, Calif., board of supervisors.
-- California state assembly members John Laird and Mark Leno and Montana state house member Christine Kaufmann won their primaries; Laird and Kaufmann have no opposition in the general election. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.