

The Kentucky supreme court has unanimously ruled against a lesbian seeking joint custody of a child she helped raise with her former partner. Chief Justice Joseph Lambert, who wrote the opinion, maintained that Brenda Fawbush was not the primary caregiver.
Over a six-year
period, Louisville residents Fawbush and Teresa Davis
raised the girl, who was a newborn when they brought her
home from the hospital. Three years ago, the couple
split up, and Davis, who had legally adopted the girl,
took her and cut off contact with her former partner.
Fawbush sued, seeking visitation and joint
custody rights, but the Kentucky court ruled
against her. The justices warned in the ruling
that Kentucky law could affect all nontraditional
caregivers, such as grandparents who raise a child
when a mother cannot. The 7–0 vote upholds a
lower court decision, which said that although Fawbush was
the primary breadwinner, she was not the primary caregiver.
According to the court, under Kentucky law she
has no standing to seek custody or visitation. (Sirius
OutQ News)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.