
Both the Episcopal Church and the Presbyterian Church voted on Tuesday in favor of a role for gays and lesbians in their faith communities. At its triennial general convention in Columbus, Ohio, the Episcopal House of Deputies decided not to follow the wish of worldwide Anglican leaders and enact a moratorium on electing openly gay bishops, while the Presbyterian national assembly voted in Birmingham, Alabama, to allow individual congregations and regional presbyteries to make their own decisions regarding gay bishops and others, the Associated Press reports.
"The vote says
we're not willing to make sacrificial lambs of our gay
and lesbian sisters and brothers and that has to leave me
feeling pretty grateful and very proud," the Reverend
Susan Russell of Integrity, the Episcopal LGBT caucus,
told the AP of her church's vote. The Episcopal Church
is the American branch of the 77-million-member
international Anglican Communion, which has been in turmoil
since the election of openly gay Gene Robinson as
bishop of New Hampshire in 2003.
With the Episcopal vote, the turmoil will only
continue, said conservatives. "Unhappily, this
decision seems to show that the Episcopal Church has
chosen to walk apart from the rest of the Anglican
Communion," Canon Martyn Minns said to the AP, alluding to
concerns over a possible permanent split in the church
over the inclusion of gays and lesbians. Many dioceses
around the world have threatened to secede if the
issue were not resolved in favor of those who would exclude
gay people.
In response to the grave situation prompted by
the vote, outgoing presiding bishop Frank Griswold
intends to call a special session today before the
Episcopal general convention ends to try to find some kind
of solution. The session will include both the House
of Deputies as well as the church's other policymaking
body, the House of Bishops.
Meanwhile, the Presbyterian Church, another
major American Protestant denomination, moved further
to the side of gays and lesbians when its national
assembly, by a 298-221 vote, approved legislation that will
let churches and regional presbyteries appoint gay
clergy, lay elders, and deacons, the AP reports.
Although the legislation also affirmed Presbyterian
law stipulating that individuals in such positions must
restrict sexual relations to opposite-sex marriage, the
measure will at least allow LGBT members of the church
to serve in such capacities. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.