

The question of whether same-sex couples from Rhode Island can marry in Massachusetts returns to court Monday. An anti-interracial-marriage law dating back to 1913 was recently upheld by the state’s supreme judicial court in a case involving gay and lesbian couples from other states wishing to marry in Massachusetts.
The antiquated law says that marriage licenses cannot be given to out-of-state couples if their marriages would not be legal in their home states, but following a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that laws barring interracial couples from marrying were illegal, the Massachusetts statute fell into disuse.
After same-sex marriage became legal in Massachusetts, however, Republican governor Mitt Romney resurrected the old law to order local clerks not to issue marriage licenses to couples from outside the state. In upholding the law in March, the state supreme judicial court noted that all the states from which the appellants came, with the exception of Rhode Island, have laws specifically banning same-sex marriage and that in the case of couples from Rhode Island, the matter should return to the lower court for a ruling.
Whatever that court rules, the decision is expected to be appealed and will likely wind up again before the supreme judicial court. (Sirius OutQ News)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.