
Conservatives are
going to court to stop Michigan State University from
providing health insurance to the domestic partners of the
school's gay employees. The American Family
Association of Michigan says the university's
domestic-partner benefits violate the state's constitutional
ban on same-sex marriage "in substance if not by label."
Michigan voters in 2004 approved an amendment
declaring the union of a man and a woman as the only
agreement recognized as marriage "or similar union for
any purpose." When Republican state attorney general
Mike Cox ruled that measure banned public employers
from offering domestic-partner benefits in future
contracts, gay employees of state and local
governments sued.
That case is currently before the Michigan court
of appeal. But attorneys for the Thomas More Law
Center say the family association had to file its own
lawsuit because it's unclear whether the attorney general
has the power to instruct public universities on how
to interpret the constitution.
The schools have argued that the state
constitution gives them latitude to offer the
domestic-partner benefits. But a Michigan State spokesman
had no immediate comment on the suit.
Among the other public universities that would
likely be affected by the outcome of Wednesday's
lawsuit are the University of Michigan, Eastern
Michigan, Central Michigan, Northern Michigan, Wayne State,
Saginaw Valley, and Oakland. (Sirius OutQ News)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.