Continental promo
||  News  ||
 
July 28, 2006

Washington State legislator promises to introduce marriage-equality bill

Washington State legislator promises to introduce marriage-equality bill

In the wake of the Washington State supreme court decision Wednesday to uphold the state's same-sex marriage ban, one of the state's gay legislators vowed to introduce a marriage-equality bill. But a dispirited state representative, Seattle Democrat Ed Murray, said he wasn't optimistic it would pass anytime soon, the Associated Press reports.

"I'll introduce a marriage equality bill," Murray, the senior of the state's four openly gay legislators, said, "but I don't expect it to pass next session or for many sessions." In its sharply divided 5–4 ruling, the court left open the possibility that the legislature could reverse its 1998 Defense of Marriage Act and legalize same-sex marriage.

Although Washington is known for being a progressive state, public-opinion polls show a majority of voters there oppose same-sex marriage, and many politicians, including Democratic governor Chris Gregoire, remain leery of the issue. "The sacrament of marriage is between two people and their faith," Gregoire told the AP, adding that she's open to offering more marriage-like benefits to gay couples. "It is not the business of the state."

Except that it is the business of the state, which is why the 19 gay and lesbian couples in the case before the supreme court were suing. "I believe that our constitution should treat all of its citizens the same, and in this case the court was willing to treat my family differently than other families," Brenda Bauer of Seattle, who sued along with her longtime partner, Celia Castle, told the AP. "Today's a pretty sad day for our family."

Meanwhile, more gay rights groups and supporters denounced the court's decision. "Today's ruling makes no sense," the Reverend Mike Schuenemeyer, national minister for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender concerns for the United Church of Christ, said in a statement Wednesday. "The court has apparently chosen not to rely on the state's constitution but on one particular religious view of marriage."

He added: "In this decision, the majority failed to respect the freedom of religion, equal protection under the law, and the right to privacy. They have denied justice and placed couples and their families seeking the right to marry in harm's way."

"America is built on the values of fairness and equality, and the long march toward realizing that dream continues," said Human Rights Campaign president Joe Solmonese in a statement. "While Washington families will continue to be denied basic fairness under the law, millions of fair-minded citizens will continue to press on for full equality. Working with Equal Rights Washington and leaders in the state, we'll now work to ensure their voices are heard in the legislature as this now moves to the statehouse."

Evan Wolfson, executive director of Freedom to Marry, said, "If, as our society believes, marriage is so important for nongay families and a fundamental right under the constitution, why isn't that true for gay couples? Why, when gay couples are involved, does the freedom to marry become so trivial that their exclusion only warrants the lowest level of 'highly deferential' review? By 5–4, these judges failed to do their job. Now the legislators must do their job, acting to end this discrimination, while we do ours, speaking out about who gay families are and why marriage matters." (The Advocate)

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Be the first to comment on this story.

Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max. HTML formatting and hyperlinks are NOT permitted.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

More Exclusives
  • View From the Hill: The End of DADT?
    Defense Secretary Robert Gates revealed that lawyers are exploring ways to ease enforcement of the military's gay ban, but cautioned that the law doesn't leave much wiggle room. He need look no further than DOD history for a lesson in altering the policy.
  • Hot Sheet: Week of July 5
    When you get back from that big 4th of July barbecue, unwind with Sacha Baron Cohen's Bruno and your favorite B-movie-mocking, basic cable robots.
  • Hungry Like the Wolf
    A master of viola, ukulele, piano, and harp, Patrick Wolf is a music prodigy -- one who, the night before this interview, spit on a cop and got himself arrested.
  • Soapside: Advocate's Guide to Daytime
    Forbes March talks about playing gay, Otalia fans outraged, update on One Life to Live’s Patricia Maurceri’s firing over gay plot point, Phillip Chancellor III big reveal, and Erica Kane goes to Africa.
  • The Faces of Federal Prop. 8
    With the federal challenge to Prop. 8 moving full speed ahead, Advocate.com sits down with the two couples named as plaintiffs in the suit.
  • Mommy, the Gays Are Coming
    After a year of advancements and celebration for gay and lesbian Colombians, the community takes to the streets of Bogota for the country's biggest pride ever.
  • The Pride of Antwerp
    Advocate.com hits the gay-friendly streets of Antwerp with openly gay police commissioner Serge Muyters.
  • Excerpt: Mean Little Deaf Queer
    In an excerpt from her humorous and harrowing new memoir, Mean Little Deaf Queer, Terry Galloway recalls her early childhood, describing feelings of ugliness, confusion about gender, and being one of the boys.
  • Top Political Blogs
    From Joe.My.God to The Daily Beast, Advocate.com spotlights a few of the best blogs that cover politics, inside and way outside the Beltway.
  • The Diva of French Television
    A hot young screenwriter who has made gay OK for millions of French viewers, Nicolas Mercier sips champagne, dons a feathered hat, and says he wants to see Colin Farrell and Jude Law go at it.