Arkansas lieutenant governor candidates spar over foster parent issue

Candidates for Arkansas's second-in-command post are squabbling over whether the state supreme court's reversal of a ban on gay foster parents should be a campaign issue. Republican lieutenant governor nominee Jim Holt questioned Tuesday whether his Democratic opponent, Bill Halter, agrees with the Arkansas supreme court June 29 ruling, while Halter said he supports reimposing the ban. Also, a Halter campaign spokesman accused Holt of using the ruling to advance his political career.

The lieutenant governor hopefuls traded criticism over the court's ruling, which said the state cannot bar gay people from becoming foster parents. Holt targeted comments Halter made days after the ruling saying he didn't believe it should be used as a political issue.

"This controversy is very much a political issue," Holt said. "This issue will determine what happens to numerous children who have in most cases already experienced deep pain.... Halter's position will reflect his philosophy on other important issues related to this topic."

Two years ago Holt was able to win a surprising 44% of the vote in his run against Democrat Blanche Lincoln. Holt tied his candidacy to a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage, which passed overwhelmingly that year.

Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee, a Republican, has said he hopes lawmakers will reimpose the ban on gay foster parents but said he doesn't expect to call a special session on the issue. Huckabee is term-limited and leaves office in January.

Democratic gubernatorial nominee Mike Beebe and Republican nominee Asa Hutchinson have both said they oppose allowing gays to become foster parents. Holt, a state senator from Springdale, said Halter has been quiet on whether the state should reimpose the ban.

Halter on Tuesday said he had talked with legislators who indicated they would pass such a ban during the regular legislative session next year. "I would support this type of legislation if, after thorough research and deliberation, it is found to be constitutional and in the best interests of Arkansas's foster children," Halter said.

Halter last month said he was unsure whether the state should reimpose the ban and said he wanted to study the ruling further. "I'd like to not have people try to use this for any sort of political gain, and let's get some more data and get the studies that we need," Halter said. "Let's make sure that we have people work well together in the future to come up with a response legislatively."

Halter campaign spokesman Bud Jackson accused Holt of doing little during his time in the senate to help the state's foster children. Jackson described Holt's legislative record as "lackluster" and focused on several of his votes, including his opposition to increasing the minimum wage.

"Jim Holt has demonstrated that he is willing to use Arkansas's most vulnerable children as a political football to advance his own political career," Jackson said.

Holt defended his work as a lawmaker and said he wasn't satisfied with Halter's stance on the foster parents ruling. "'If' is a big word, and he has placed so many conditions on his decision that everyone in Arkansas can see he is just pandering," Holt said. "There is not one bit of conviction in his answer." (AP)

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Be the first to comment on this story.

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

Error:Server capacity reached.

Error:Server capacity reached.