

A judge in Des
Moines denied a request by 25 lawmakers Wednesday to
intervene in a legal battle over the state's ban on
same-sex marriages. Judge Robert Hanson overruled
several arguments made by the lawmakers, including one
that said allowing same-sex marriages would
have a sweeping impact on the state's budget and
several other laws.
"Whether or not constitutional claims are valid
is a matter of judicial determination, not
legislative," Hanson said in his ruling. "The
separation of powers between legislative and judicial
authority is not endangered by this case. Nor will any
determination by this court limit the legislature's
authority to make laws."
"We are thrilled that the court has stopped this
effort at meddling and allowed these couples to seek
these important rights for their families without
interference or grandstanding by politicians," Camilla
Taylor, staff attorney in Lambda Legal's Midwest office in
Chicago and attorney on the case, told The
Advocate. "Unlike the politicians who sought to
intervene, plaintiffs have a direct stake in the case.
Plaintiffs and their children need the vital supports
and protections that come only with marriage, such as
the ability to visit each other in the hospital or take
bereavement leave if they suffer a death in the family."
The lawmakers, all but one of whom are
Republicans, wanted to be included as defendants in a
lawsuit filed by six gay and lesbian couples who
contend that the state's marriage laws are unconstitutional.
Republican representative Carmine Boal said
legislators were disappointed by the decision but are
not convinced the couples will win the case. "We've
seen some court decisions in other states that we believe
strengthen our case," Boal said.
Supreme courts in Washington State and New York
issued defeats for same-sex marriage proponents in
decisions released last month. Iowa's lawsuit, filed
in December, contends that the gay couples were treated
unfairly when Polk County recorder Tim Brien improperly
denied them marriage licenses. The lawsuit argues that
Iowa's marriage law is unconstitutional because it
draws "impermissible distinctions based on sex and
sexual orientation."
The trial is scheduled to begin October 23. (AP
contributed to this report)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.