

New York City council speaker Christine C. Quinn, the city's most visible gay official, has come under fire from her gay constituency after she proposed last week that the city's 250 nightclubs be required to install security cameras at their entrances and exits, The New York Times reports. Several gay leaders have said the cameras would be an invasion of privacy and pose a particular threat to those who are not open about being gay.
''It smacks of Big Brother,'' William K. Dobbs, a longtime gay activist, told the Times, adding that the cameras could keep some people away from the clubs. ''It will have an impact on everybody who enjoys New York nightlife.''
While the details of the proposal have yet to be worked out, it would apply to nightclubs that operate with city-issued cabaret licenses that allow dancing. If the nightclub owners refused to comply, their licenses could be suspended or revoked.
Recent crimes in and around nightclubs, including the separate murders of two young women, have officials in the city calling for action. Quinn contends that the owners should install the security cameras to protect their patrons. Quinn, who also wants to require nightclubs to install identification-checking machines to curb underage drinking, plans to convene a nightlife conference next month for club owners and city agencies to discuss other ways to improve club safety.
The backlash over security cameras illustrates the political pitfalls facing Quinn, who was elected speaker in January. Allen Roskoff, president of the Jim Owles Liberal Democratic Club, a citywide political organization formed by gay activists in 2004, told the Times that Quinn is now in the position of ''having to please a more diverse constituency than the progressive constituency that elected her.'' (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.