
More than a month
after Patricia Todd's historic primary victory that has
her set to become Alabama's first openly gay legislator, her
election has still not been certified—and her
supporters are asking the state's Democratic Party to
stop dragging its feet on the matter. Todd's 59-vote
victory over opponent Gaynell Hendricks in the July 18
contest was challenged by Hendricks's mother-in-law,
even though election officials reported no voting
irregularities and held a recount that confirmed Todd
had won, and now local Democratic officials are apparently
meddling with the panel that will hear the challenge.
"Democracy means nothing if backroom deals can
change the outcome of a fair election," Chuck Wolfe,
president and CEO of the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund,
which backed Todd, said in a statement. "The people
have spoken, but party power brokers are insisting on having
the last word. That's un-American."
Wolfe added, "The Alabama Democratic Party shows
little inclination to conduct a fair hearing based on
the merits of the challenge, and we have lost faith in
that process. It's unthinkable that in 2006 some
politically powerful insiders still consider themselves
untethered to democratic principles and superior to
the electorate. If the party has no intention of
protecting the rights of voters, then we intend to ask the
courts to step in to do so."
Party bosses reportedly prefer Hendricks and are
unhappy that Todd, who faces no opponent in November's
general election, won. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.