

Phoenix mayor
Phil Gordon is opposing an Arizona constitutional
amendment to ban same-sex marriage, saying its prohibition
of domestic-partner benefits could hurt the city's
recruitment of talented employees. Gordon said
Tuesday that if the city of Phoenix cannot offer
health insurance to the domestic partners of its
employees, it could jeopardize the city's "ability to
compete against the private sector or other cities" as
the city grows rapidly. Phoenix currently provides the
benefit to 176 employees.
Recently retired University of Arizona president
Peter Likins also is opposed to the proposed amendment
to the state constitution. Likins and Gordon filed a
brief with the Arizona supreme court last week, supporting
an appeal to remove Proposition 107, known as Protect
Marriage Arizona, from the November 7 ballot.
A Maricopa County superior court judge ruled
that the measure can remain on the ballot because it
does not violate the requirement that constitutional
amendments address a single subject. Opponents say the
initiative deals with two subjects: same-sex marriages and
domestic-partner benefits. The state supreme court is taking
up the question on appeal and is expected to rule this
week or next week.
Proposition 107 would amend the constitution to
ban same-sex marriages, which are already illegal
under state law. It also bars political subdivisions
of the state—such as cities, counties, universities,
and school districts—from recognizing any
relationship similar to marriage, such as civil unions
or domestic partnerships.
Though proponents skirted the issue early in the
campaign, they now acknowledge that the measure would
also invalidate domestic-partner benefits now in place
across the state. Peter Gentala, legal counsel for the
Center for Arizona Policy, which is backing the proposition,
said the measure has "a single, common purpose, and
that is protecting marriage from contemporary challenges."
Gentala points to similar measures that have
passed and withstood legal challenges in other states.
"What they are saying is that there are all sorts of
relationships that are no different than marriage, and that
is incorrect, because marriage has a unique place in
society," Gentala said. (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.