South Africa's government scaled back the influence of its minister for AIDS policy, who has been pilloried for questioning the effectiveness of antiretroviral drug treatments and for promoting a diet of beetroot, garlic, and African potatoes as an effective treatment for AIDS.
A group of international scientists called for Health Minister Dr. Manto Tshabalala-Msimang, nicknamed ''Dr. Beetroot,'' to be fired, and they labeled South Africa's program ''inefficient and immoral.''
Government spokesman Themba Maseko defended the minister but said Friday that the Cabinet had appointed a committee headed by Deputy President Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka to oversee the implementation of the country's AIDS program.
''We need to shift focus from saying the problem in the program is the minister of health,'' Maseko said.
In an open letter to President Thabo Mbeki on Wednesday, 81 international AIDS scientists called the health minister an embarrassment to South Africa who has undermined HIV science and who has no international respect.
The scientists include American Nobel Laureate David Baltimore and Dr. Robert Gallo, a codiscoverer of the virus that causes AIDS and developer of the first HIV blood test. They called for an end to South Africa's ''disastrous pseudoscientific policies'' and urged Mbeki to remove the health minister immediately.
With the letter the scientists joined mounting calls by AIDS activists and opposition parties for the president to fire Tshabalala-Msimang.
South Africa has an estimated 5.5 million people infected with HIV, a number second only to India and one that amounts to about an eighth of estimated cases worldwide. On average, more than 900 people die of AIDS each day in South Africa. The government said Thursday that the adult death rate had climbed significantly over a seven-year period largely because of AIDS.
Mbeki previously has expressed doubts about the connection between HIV and AIDS and along with Tshabalala-Msimang has questioned the effectiveness of antiretroviral drugs in treating the disease.
Tshabalala-Msimang's office said in a statement Friday that there was a campaign aimed at deliberately misrepresenting the government's program to fight the disease.
Her statement and the Cabinet reacted not only to the scientists' letter but also to other attacks on its policies at the International AIDS conference in Toronto last month, including a scathing one by Stephen Lewis, the U.N. special envoy for AIDS in Africa.
''It is the only country in Africa ... whose government is still obtuse, dilatory, and negligent about rolling out treatment,'' Lewis said. ''It is the only country in Africa whose government continues to promote theories more worthy of a lunatic fringe than of a concerned and compassionate state.''
The scientists noted that at the AIDS conference the South African exhibition featured garlic, lemons, and African potatoes, ''with the implication that these dietary elements are alternative treatments.''
Maseko, the government spokesman, said the health minister had made it clear that South Africa's program included antiretrovirals and nutrition, but that she might have given the impression the focus was on nutrition and specific nutrients.
''Nutrition is not an alternative to antiretrovirals or forms of treatment. This has always been the government approach on this matter,'' Maseko said. ''Equally, the misconception that antiretrovirals are a cure for AIDS is not only misleading but dangerous as it creates false hopes.''
The government, which did not provide AIDS drugs until forced to do so by a 2002 court ruling, said its AIDS program is now the largest in the world. It estimates it treats 140,000 people with antiretroviral drugs.
However, that number is less than half of the target of 380,000 the government set in 2003 and well below the 500,000 South Africans that the scientists estimate now need the drugs to survive. (Terry Leonard, AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.
Home | Contact | Current Issue | LGBT Community Partners | Staff
Jobs | Help
Subscribe: Print Edition Digital Edition | Subscriber Services: Print Edition Digital Edition
Visit our Websites
Out.com | OutTraveler.com | HIVPlusMag.com | Alyson.com | HereTV.com | GayWired.com | SheWired.com
Privacy Policy | User Agreement | Community Guidelines | Legal Notice
Advocate.com © 2009 Regent Entertainment Media Inc. All Rights Reserved.
