

Anglican bishops meeting in New York on Monday have called for a kind of temporary truce in an effort to avert a full-blown schism in the Episcopal Church over the issue of homosexuality. The most likely outcome is a “two-church solution” for the United States, reports The [London] Times, allowing conservatives and liberals to exist, separate but side by side, as members of the worldwide Anglican communion.
The bishops are planning on drawing up a pact this week, giving the appearance of unity and enabling a final deal to be hammered out at the Lambeth Conference in 2008. They will will consider a paper from the seven conservative dioceses of the Episcopal Church that oppose the leadership of liberal U.S. bishop Katharine Schori and have appealed to the archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, for alternative oversight. The conservatives argue that there are already, in effect, two churches under one roof in the United States and appeal for a special “commissary” to be appointed to look after them and enable a “cease-fire” until a peace treaty is reached at Lambeth, The Times reports.
Sources have told The Times that the aim is for Williams to invite all 890 bishops and archbishops to the Lambeth Conference. That would include gay New Hampshire bishop Gene Robinson, whose consecration in 2003 triggered the crisis, and any other openly gay bishops consecrated since. Although the Nigerian bishops are among those who have have pledged to boycott the conference if Bishop Robinson is present, sources hope that they might be persuaded to turn up if a settlement can be reached.
“It is remarkable that they are even talking to each other,” said one senior source of the bishops meeting in New York. “There is a seriously big go-wrong factor here. This is an internal meeting, but it has huge external implications for the whole church.” (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.