Advocates of same-sex marriage vow appeal of California ruling

Advocates of same-sex marriage vowed to appeal a state appeals court ruling upholding California's ban on same-sex weddings—a decision that would be a critical defeat for their cause if it stands. In reversing the March 2005 ruling of a San Francisco trial judge, the first district court of appeal on Thursday dealt another setback to the movement to expand same-sex marriage beyond Massachusetts.

This summer high courts in New York and Washington State also refused to strike down laws prohibiting same-sex marriage. But unlike in those states, gay activists in California still have another chance to get the state's marriage laws overturned. They and their opponents have said they expect the California supreme court to settle the issue.

''While we are disappointed that the court of appeal ruled against our families, we are confident that we will prevail and that the California dream will be available to all,'' said Geoff Kors, executive director of Equality California.

Opponents of same-sex marriage praised the court's decision. ''The court understood that marriage has a meaning, and that unless you redefine marriage, all the arguments the other side have made are meaningless,'' said Glen Lavy, an attorney for Alliance Defense Fund, which asked the appeals court to overturn the lower court ruling.

In a 2–1 decision, the appeals court agreed with the state's attorney general, who argued that it is up to the legislature, not the courts, to change the traditional definition of marriage as a union between a man and a woman.

''We conclude California's historical definition of marriage does not deprive individuals of a vested fundamental right,'' the court majority said. ''The time may come when California chooses to expand the definition of marriage to encompass same-sex unions. That change must come from democratic processes, however, not by judicial fiat.''

The justices said the state has gone a long way toward promoting equality for same-sex couples through its strong domestic-partner law, which gives registered couples the same rights as married spouses. They rejected arguments from same-sex marriage proponents that such a ''separate but equal'' system was discriminatory.

''It is rational for the legislature to preserve the opposite-sex definition of marriage, which has existed throughout history,'' Justice William McGuiness wrote.

In a strongly worded dissent, Justice Anthony Kline scoffed at what he said was his colleagues' suggestion that same-sex couples should not be entitled to marry now simply because they had not been permitted to in the past. ''The fact that same-sex couples have traditionally been prohibited from marrying is the reason this lawsuit was commenced,'' he wrote.

Since 2004, when Massachusetts became the first state to legalize same-sex marriage, advocates have seen California as one of their best hopes for expanding the movement.

The state is home to more same-sex couples than any other and is one of 26 with statutes limiting marriage to a man and a woman. Another 19 states passed constitutional amendments barring same-sex marriage after Massachusetts gays won the right to wed. (Lisa Leff, AP)

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Name: alice lukasik
Date posted: 2009-05-30 7:01 PM
Hometown: camp verde,az

Comment:

One word with different meanings is the beginning of ambiguity. There are distinct nouns for clouds in all thier forms. how many words for all the shades of blue? New nouns are needed to depict changes in cultural dynamics. the word marriage can 't distinguish the obvious differences of these unions. Create New nouns for same sex unions. all obstructions would dissolve if language recognized the differences. Water, ice and steam have everything but temperature in common. Marriage is the union between a man and a woman. want legal recognition create nouns to distinguish it.Distinction in language would distinquish these relationships and legal objection would dissoved.

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

More Exclusives

View From the Hill: The End of DADT?
Defense Secretary Robert Gates revealed that lawyers are exploring ways to ease enforcement of the military's gay ban, but cautioned that the law doesn't leave much wiggle room. He need look no further than DOD history for a lesson in altering the policy.

Hot Sheet: Week of July 5
When you get back from that big 4th of July barbecue, unwind with Sacha Baron Cohen's Bruno and your favorite B-movie-mocking, basic cable robots.

Hungry Like the Wolf
A master of viola, ukulele, piano, and harp, Patrick Wolf is a music prodigy -- one who, the night before this interview, spit on a cop and got himself arrested.

Soapside: Advocate's Guide to Daytime
Forbes March talks about playing gay, Otalia fans outraged, update on One Life to Live’s Patricia Maurceri’s firing over gay plot point, Phillip Chancellor III big reveal, and Erica Kane goes to Africa.

The Faces of Federal Prop. 8
With the federal challenge to Prop. 8 moving full speed ahead, Advocate.com sits down with the two couples named as plaintiffs in the suit.

Mommy, the Gays Are Coming
After a year of advancements and celebration for gay and lesbian Colombians, the community takes to the streets of Bogota for the country's biggest pride ever.

The Pride of Antwerp
Advocate.com hits the gay-friendly streets of Antwerp with openly gay police commissioner Serge Muyters.

Excerpt: Mean Little Deaf Queer
In an excerpt from her humorous and harrowing new memoir, Mean Little Deaf Queer, Terry Galloway recalls her early childhood, describing feelings of ugliness, confusion about gender, and being one of the boys.

Top Political Blogs
From Joe.My.God to The Daily Beast, Advocate.com spotlights a few of the best blogs that cover politics, inside and way outside the Beltway.

The Diva of French Television
A hot young screenwriter who has made gay OK for millions of French viewers, Nicolas Mercier sips champagne, dons a feathered hat, and says he wants to see Colin Farrell and Jude Law go at it.