
Monday, Hong Kong’s government gave in to a challenge to its gay sex laws, lowering the age of consent from 21 to 16. The decision followed a humiliating government defeat in court system after an appeal against a judicial review’s decision that the law governing the age of homosexual consent was unconstitutional.
Hong Kong’s Security Bureau said in a statement that it would not seek to challenge the court's decision. "After considering all the relevant factors, the government decided not to appeal the judicial review."
Since Hong Kong only decriminalized homosexuality in 1991, gay and lesbian youths had faced life imprisonment if they were caught having sex before the age of 21. Their heterosexual counterparts, however, faced a five-year sentence. In a decision made by the courts in September, the law was rendered unenforceable.
"I fail to see on any basis the justification of this age limit," chief high court judge Geoffrey Ma wrote in his judgment last month. "No evidence has been placed before us to explain why the minimum age requirement for buggery is 21 whereas as far as sexual intercourse between a man and a woman is concerned, the age of consent is only 16."
The case was originally brought to the courts by William Leung, a 21-year-old gay man.
His lawyer, Michael Vidler, hailed the government decision in a statement. "Now they are not appealing it, which means they accept the fact and the court's judgment. It's about time the government initiates steps to remove the law without further delay. Failure to do so will be a slap in the face for the constitution." (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.