
U.K. fertility experts issued recommendations on Wednesday to reduce the rising number of twin births in cases of in-vitro fertilization, including the transfer of only one embryo into the womb.
In a report presented to the nation's fertility watchdog, the panel of experts said research has shown that limiting the number of embryos transferred can reduce the number of twins born through in-vitro fertilization without changing the overall success rate.
"Multiple birth is the single biggest risk to children born as a result of IVF," Professor Peter Braude of Kings College in London and the chair of the panel told a news conference.
Some patients and clinics opt for transferring two embryos to increase the odds of success, but Braude said the rate of twins can be reduced by limiting the number to one without damaging a woman's chance of conceiving. "The overall pregnancy rate is the same," he said.
The expert group identified two main options in the report. One would be to set a maximum twin birth rate of, for example, 5%–10% for fertility clinics.
The other is for single embryo transfer for women who are more likely to have twins. This would be determined by the woman's age, the quality of embryos produced, and other factors.
But Braude added that for some women, single embryo transfer may not be the best option.
The experts presented their findings to a meeting of the Human fertilization and Embryology Authority watchdog on Wednesday.
About 25% of IVF births in the United Kingdom are twins, They are more likely than single babies to be premature, which increases their odds of suffering medical and development problems.
The risk of death in the first week of life is five times higher for twins than a single baby. Twins are also around six times more likely to suffer from cerebral palsy and have a higher risk of congenital abnormalities, according to the report.
Multiple births also pose a danger for the mother. Twin births carry a higher risk of miscarriage, bleeding, early labor, caesarean delivery, and preeclampsia, a complication that occurs in about 5% of pregnancies.
Professor Bill Ledger, a fertility specialist at the University of Sheffield and a panel member, said the medical costs resulting from twins births are 16 times more than those for a single birth.
He estimated that reducing multiple births resulting from IVF could save enough money to fund 7,500 extra cycles of IVF, which could produce 2,000 children.
Professor Chris Barratt, of the University of Birmingham Medical School, said the United Kingdom should be aiming for a twin birth rate of about 5%. "One quarter of live births are currently twins. Even though this is perceived as a success, the truth is that it's much better for all concerned to have one child at a time," he said in a statement in reaction to the report. (Reuters)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.