Court: N.J. gay couples entitled to same rights as heterosexual couples

New Jersey’s supreme court ruled in favor of equal protection for same-sex couples Wednesday but stopped short of compelling the state to deem that status "marriage," saying what to name it was up to the legislature. The high court gave lawmakers 180 days to incorporate gay couples into existing marriage laws or create a new system of civil unions for them.

The 4–3 ruling is similar to the 1999 decision in Vermont that led to civil unions providing equal rights and benefits to gay couples there, but it does not go as far as Massachusetts’s high court in 2003, which legalized marriage equality in name too. New Jersey's current domestic-partnership laws provide limited protections for same-sex couples, but with this ruling gay and lesbian couples will soon receive the full range of protections that straight married couples enjoy.

''Although we cannot find that a fundamental right to same-sex marriage exists in this state, the unequal dispensation of rights and benefits to committed same-sex partners can no longer be tolerated under our state constitution,'' Justice Barry T. Albin wrote for the majority's decision. "With this state’s legislative and judicial commitment to eradicating sexual orientation discrimination as our backdrop, we now hold that denying rights and benefits to committed same-sex couples that are statutorily given to their heterosexual counterparts violates the equal protection guarantee of Article I, Paragraph 1" of the New Jersey constitution.

"To comply with this constitutional mandate, the legislature must either amend the marriage statutes to include same-sex couples or create a parallel statutory structure, which will provide for, on equal terms, the rights and benefits enjoyed and burdens and obligations borne by married couples," Justice Albin added. "We will not presume that a separate statutory scheme, which uses a title other than marriage, contravenes equal protection principles, so long as the rights and benefits of civil marriage are made equally available to same-sex couples. The name to be given to the statutory scheme that provides full rights and benefits to same-sex couples, whether marriage or some other term, is a matter left to the democratic process."

In her dissenting opinion, which two of her colleagues joined, Chief Justice Deborah T. Poritz wrote that she could find “no principled basis” to distinguish equal rights and benefits “from the right to the title of marriage.” Poritz, who stepped down from the court Wednesday before turning the mandatory retirement age of 70 on Thursday, also disputed the majority’s conclusion that there is no fundamental right to same-sex marriage.

At the Human Rights Campaign, executive director Joe Solmonese said in a statement that the opinion "at its core" was "a pro-family, pro-equality decision" and asked lawmakers to "embrace marriage equality" as they consider their route forward.

Lambda Legal, which brought the suit forward on behalf of seven plaintiff couples, concurred, characterizing the decision as a "big step forward for our community."

"The bottom line here is that the entire court said that there must be a remedy for the inequality that bars same-sex couples from marriage," said David Buckel, the group's Marriage Project director, who argued the case before the high court as lead counsel, in a statement. "The question for the legislature is an easy one: Whether to follow through on the support of the majority of voters in this state to allow their gay friends and neighbors to marry, including over 20,000 committed same-sex couples raising more than 12,000 children." Public opinion polls have shown that a majority of New Jerseyans support marriage equality.

"The legislature cares about families and helping people be more responsible for each other and their children, so we hope it will pass a law quickly to honor the freedom to marry for same-sex couples," Buckel added.

Jon Davidson, Lambda's legal director, added that for the first time, all seven justices on a high court panel found that the constitution guarantees equal rights and benefits to same-sex couples. That was not the case in Washington State, he said, another 4–3 cliffhanger ruling. "The discussion's not over," Davidson said. "We have six months to get the legislature to allow same-sex couples to marry. And at worst, same-sex couples in New Jersey will gain a vast number of rights and benefits that they did not formerly have."

In the case, the seven couples, who have been together between 13 and 34 years and have several children among them, were seeking full marriage rights. After two lower courts ruled against them, they appealed to the supreme court, which heard oral arguments last February.

Leading the list of plaintiff couples are Mark Lewis and Dennis Winslow, two Episcopalian pastors from Union City who have been together for 15 years. "We get moral approval from our church and those who love us; what we need from our government isn't approval but equality in legal rights and responsibilities," Lewis said in a statement before the ruling.

Although the plaintiffs got that—save the title of marriage—not all interested observers were pleased. New Jersey activists, for their part, were openly outraged by the compromise. Following a contingency plan for just this sort of result, Garden State Equality launched an extensive call to arms within an hour of the court's mid-afternoon announcement.

In a statement, the group said assembly speaker pro-tem Wilfredo Caraballo, Assemblyman Brian Stack, and Assemblyman Reed Gusciora will "rapidly" introduce a bill to open marriage to same-sex couples. Garden State Equality will immediately start airing a television commercial featuring the late Laurel Hester, a police lieutenant who spent her last days fighting for her pension rights to be awarded to her partner. The organization is also releasing a letter from 268 state leaders calling on lawmakers to pass equal marriage, and holding a rally on Wednesday evening.

"It wouldn't matter if the legislature added all the rights in the world to the current law without calling it marriage," said Garden State's chairman, Steven Goldstein, in the statement. "Marriage is the only currency of commitment the real world universally understands and accepts."

Goldstein went on to outline a coordinated strategy for the coming months, starting with creating and leading a coalition of 150 organizations across the state called the Statewide Task Force for a Marriage Equality Statute. The "Equality Express" bus will also take the case for marriage equality throughout New Jersey on weekend tours.

And the previously announced "Awesome Autumn" campaign will be accelerated. Goldstein described the effort, centered on 50 public events, as "the most concentrated, most ambitious statewide barnstorm ever produced by a public interest organization in New Jersey."

Goldstein also promised "dozens of more actions" geared toward winning the right to marry within the court's deadline. "So help us God, we will never give up and we will never give in to those who tell us no," Goldstein said. "Hell no. Over our dead bodies will we settle for less than 100% marriage equality.

"We will continue to exhaust our opponents until we win the marriage equality our families deserve. We will continue to outthink, outwork, and outhustle the hatemongers every step of the way."

Davina Kotulski, head of Marriage Equality USA, described the decision as "bittersweet" and called for the legislature to steer clear of "civil unions, domestic partnerships, reciprocal beneficiaries, and new 'whoseewhatsits' terms invented to keep the distinction between same-sex couples and different-sex couples."

Outside the supreme court, news of the ruling caused confusion, with many of the roughly 100 same-sex marriage supporters present asking each other what it meant. Many started to agree that they needed to push for a state constitutional amendment to institute same-sex marriage.

Gay couples in New Jersey can already apply for domestic partnerships under a law the legislature passed in 2004 giving gay couples some benefits of marriage, such as the right to inherit possessions if there is no will and health care coverage for state workers. Gov. Jon S. Corzine, a Democrat, supports domestic partnerships but not same-sex marriage—although he has said he would follow whatever the court ruled.

Supporters pushing for full same-sex marriage have had a two-year losing streak in state courts in New York and Washington as well as in Nebraska and Georgia, where voter-approved bans on same-sex marriage were reinstated. They also have suffered at the ballot boxes in 15 states where constitutions have been amended to ban same-sex unions.

Cases similar to the one ruled on Wednesday are pending in California, Connecticut, Iowa, and Maryland. ''New Jersey is a stepping stone,'' said Matt Daniels, president of the Virginia-based Alliance for Marriage, a group pushing for an amendment to the federal Constitution to outlaw same-sex marriage. ''It's not about New Jersey.'' (Ann Rostow, Barbara Wilcox, and the AP contributed to this report)

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Be the first to comment on this story.

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

More Exclusives

View From the Hill: The End of DADT?
Defense Secretary Robert Gates revealed that lawyers are exploring ways to ease enforcement of the military's gay ban, but cautioned that the law doesn't leave much wiggle room. He need look no further than DOD history for a lesson in altering the policy.

Hot Sheet: Week of July 5
When you get back from that big 4th of July barbecue, unwind with Sacha Baron Cohen's Bruno and your favorite B-movie-mocking, basic cable robots.

Hungry Like the Wolf
A master of viola, ukulele, piano, and harp, Patrick Wolf is a music prodigy -- one who, the night before this interview, spit on a cop and got himself arrested.

Soapside: Advocate's Guide to Daytime
Forbes March talks about playing gay, Otalia fans outraged, update on One Life to Live’s Patricia Maurceri’s firing over gay plot point, Phillip Chancellor III big reveal, and Erica Kane goes to Africa.

The Faces of Federal Prop. 8
With the federal challenge to Prop. 8 moving full speed ahead, Advocate.com sits down with the two couples named as plaintiffs in the suit.

Mommy, the Gays Are Coming
After a year of advancements and celebration for gay and lesbian Colombians, the community takes to the streets of Bogota for the country's biggest pride ever.

The Pride of Antwerp
Advocate.com hits the gay-friendly streets of Antwerp with openly gay police commissioner Serge Muyters.

Excerpt: Mean Little Deaf Queer
In an excerpt from her humorous and harrowing new memoir, Mean Little Deaf Queer, Terry Galloway recalls her early childhood, describing feelings of ugliness, confusion about gender, and being one of the boys.

Top Political Blogs
From Joe.My.God to The Daily Beast, Advocate.com spotlights a few of the best blogs that cover politics, inside and way outside the Beltway.

The Diva of French Television
A hot young screenwriter who has made gay OK for millions of French viewers, Nicolas Mercier sips champagne, dons a feathered hat, and says he wants to see Colin Farrell and Jude Law go at it.