
A conservative Republican lawmaker is considering whether to stop blocking a judicial nominee over concerns that her appearance at a lesbian commitment ceremony betrayed her legal views on same-sex marriage. Notoriously antigay U.S. senator Sam Brownback of Kansas, a potential 2008 presidential candidate, said Michigan court of appeals judge Janet T. Neff should not be disqualified automatically for having attended the ceremony. But Brownback made clear it raises doubts in his mind.
''But what I want to know is, What does it do to her look at the law? What does she consider the law on same-sex marriage, on civil unions, and I'd want to consider that,'' Brownback said Sunday during an appearance on ABC's This Week.
President Bush nominated Neff, who has a liberal reputation, to be a U.S. district court judge as part of a compromise struck with Democrats. Neff's nomination is pending before the full Senate; Brownback has stalled it because of her attendance at the 2002 ceremony in Massachusetts. ''I'm still looking at the Neff situation, and I will in the future,'' Brownback said.
Neff has said she attended as a friend of one of the two women, a longtime neighbor. Neff has declined to answer Brownback's queries on whether the Constitution guarantees a right to same-sex marriage or civil unions, saying it would be improper to address questions that might come before her as a federal judge.
Brownback called same-sex marriage a developing area of the law that should not be left to the judiciary. ''To me, these issues should be decided by the legislative bodies, not by the judicial bodies, and it seems to me this may indicate some view of hers on the legal issue. And that's what I'm concerned about here, is her view of the legal issue involving same-sex marriage,'' Brownback said.
Democratic senator Dick Durbin of Illinois urged taking a step back, away from ''the political agenda,'' in considering judicial appointees. ''You know, these are important lifetime appointments. These men and women who serve on the bench, we really trust their judgment and their wisdom, and giving these political litmus tests I don't think is in the best interest of justice in America,'' said Durbin, who will be the number 2 Democrat in the Senate.
In an October 12 letter to Brownback, Neff said a minister presided over the ceremony and she insisted her attendance would not affect her ability to act fairly as a federal judge. ''The ceremony, which was entirely private, took place in Massachusetts, where I had no authority to act in any official capacity and where, in any event, the ceremony had no legal effect,'' Neff wrote. (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.