
A measure that would grant gay and lesbian couples civil unions in New Jersey but would stop short of providing marriage equality was passed by a state senate committee on Monday, drawing criticism from gay rights groups who described the bill as discriminatory. The bill now goes to the full senate for a vote.
The bill is in response to a state supreme court ruling calling on the legislature to provide equality to the state's same-sex couples. David Buckel, an attorney for Lambda Legal, which brought the original lawsuit against the state, said in a statement on Monday that the bill was moving too quickly through the legislature for justice to prevail. Buckel said a recent Quinnipiac University poll shows more New Jersey residents favor marriage equality than in early polling, closing in on 50%.
"Each day that goes by, more people favor equality and justice," he said. "The legislature is not taking the time it needs to consider this issue—it is rushing to the wrong side of history. The judiciary committee today did not even listen to any testimony from couples whose lives will be directly affected by the outcome of the vote." (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.