Alaska governor
Sarah Palin said the state will abide by an Alaska
supreme court order to provide benefits to same-sex partners
of state employees as of January 1. Palin's decision
came one day after the Alaska supreme court told the
state to stop dragging its feet and implement
domestic-partner benefits, which were first ordered 14
months ago.
"We believe we have no more judicial options,"
Palin said but added that she still wants voters in a
special April election to consider the prospect of a
constitutional amendment designed to prohibit such
benefits. She signed into law a bill passed by state
lawmakers in a November special session calling for
voters to weigh in.
Voters will be asked if the legislature should
adopt a proposed constitutional amendment to prohibit
the state or municipalities from providing these
benefits. If there is overwhelming support, then
legislators could pass a resolution with two-thirds support
that would go before voters in the 2008 general election.
The pending implementation is a long time
coming, says Carrie Evans, state legislative director
for Washington, D.C.–based gay rights group
Human Rights Campaign. "We haven't seen that kind of
defiance by the governor and legislature of a high
court ruling; it's extraordinary," Evans said. "Some
states just grumble. What we saw was Alaska digging in
its heels." Alaska will become the 14th U.S. state that has
a law, policy, or court decision that provides these
benefits, according to the organization.
For now, this ends a six year-battle for the
American Civil Liberties Union and nine couples who
filed a lawsuit challenging the lack of benefits for
same-sex couples employed by the state and the municipality
of Anchorage. The high court ruled in October 2005 that
denying benefits to same-sex domestic partners
violated the state's guarantee of equal protection for
all Alaskans. (Steve Quinn, AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.