
The South African Center for Epidemiological Modeling and Analysis said new studies showing circumcision reduced the risk of HIV transmission by up to 60% indicated it was time to study how to implement a circumcision program.
"South Africa stands to benefit more than any other country from male circumcision by virtue of the very high current HIV prevalence and the relatively low rate of circumcision in the country," SACEMA said in a statement. "Over the next 20 years male circumcision in South Africa could avert 1.4 million new cases of HIV and 800,000 HIV deaths."
South Africa has one of the world's largest HIV/AIDS caseloads, with 5.5 million of its 45 million people infected, and studies have warned that the country's epidemic continues to spread at a rapid rate, particularly among the young.
Researchers this month concluded after halting two large clinical trials in Kenya and Uganda that circumcision was a valuable tool in the fight against HIV, echoing results from an earlier study in South Africa.
Experts say the reduced HIV risk may be because cells on the inside of the foreskin, which is removed in circumcision, are particularly susceptible to HIV infection.
Researchers have cautioned that circumcision is not a panacea, that it reduces the chances of infection by at most 60% and that existing programs to encourage condom use and reduction in numbers of sexual partners must continue.
South Africa's health ministry has reacted cautiously to the two studies, saying it needs time to review their conclusions.
"Prevention of infections remains the mainstay of our national response to HIV and AIDS. The broad range of prevention measures, including the correct and consistent use of condoms, continues to be implemented to reverse the tide of HIV and AIDS," the ministry said in a statement.
SACEMA, which was involved in the first South African study on circumcision, said it was time to consider ramping up a national circumcision campaign.
"SACEMA is keen to assist wherever possible to support operational research to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of large-scale male circumcision in South Africa," the group said. (Reuters)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.