
A New York congressman on Wednesday jokingly suggested the Bush administration may fear a ''platoon of lesbians'' more than terrorists in Baghdad, given the military's resistance to letting gays serve openly.
Rep. Gary Ackerman's criticism of Pentagon policy came as Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice testified before the House Foreign Affairs Committee. Ackerman, a New York City Democrat, complained to Rice that the military had fired Arabic and Farsi translators after learning the translators were gay.
''For some reason, the military seems more afraid of gay people than they are against terrorists. They're very brave with the terrorists, and if the terrorists ever got ahold of this information, they'd get a platoon of lesbians to chase us out of Baghdad,'' said Ackerman, prompting laughter in the hearing room.
The lawmaker, who in 2002 voted for the invasion of Iraq but is now a fierce opponent of the war, made one other crack too, this time in reference to the Bush administration's opposition to same-sex marriage.
Ackerman suggested the State Department could hire dozens of outed—and ousted—former military translators.
''Can we marry up these two—or maybe that's not the right word.... Can we have some kind of union of those two issues?'' Ackerman asked, prompting a fresh outburst of laughter.
Rice, in diplomatic fashion, played it cool.
''Congressman, I'm not aware of the availability of people, but I will certainly look,'' she said, adding that her department has quadrupled the number of employees in critical languages.
Officials with the national gay rights group Human Rights Campaig, said Ackerman was right to criticize the military's policy of ''don't ask, don't tell'' concerning gays.
''It is clear the congressman was underscoring the ridiculousness of the 'don't ask, don't tell' policy and how it's hurting our efforts to fight the war on terror,'' said HRC spokesman Luis Vizcaino. (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.