
Former British boy-band member and openly gay Harvard alum Tom Lowe auditioned for American Idol 6 in Seattle and earned a spot to the next round, but his impressive audition was not aired on Fox in the United States. Instead, it aired in the United Kingdom on January 19, reports Nikki Finke of Deadlinehollywood.com. One of the reasons Lowe's audition may not have aired, purports Finke, is that during the audition Randy Jackson asked Lowe if Simon Cowell had ever tried to sign Lowe's former boy band, North and South. Lowe replied, "No, but I believe Simon was working for BMG at the same time I was there." The British press quickly ran headlines accusing Cowell of planting Lowe and trying to "fix" the contest.
Some allege that Lowe's past successes with North and South and as a back-up singer for U.K. band Take That make him too well-connected and successful to compete fairly.
Others are concerned that Lowe may not be "wholesome" enough for American Idol because he allegedly posed nude for a British magazine as "Britain Choirboy of the Year." He became a well-known figure around Harvard after competing for the Mr. Harvard title in which, according to The Harvard Crimson, contestants were "parading in bathing suits, shaking scantily clad behinds to the tunes of Britney Spears, and performing a racy striptease." Lowe also donned a pink lounge suit and black eyeliner in the campus band Tommy and the Tigers.
Lowe courted controversy in December of last year when the Boston Herald reported that Massachusetts taxpayers had shelled out $60,000 for Lowe's six-month contract that he had signed to star in a $400,000 Web-TV tourism promotion. Critics asked why Lowe's contract was as long as six months. However the tourism board backed Lowe and got him a gig singing "The Star-spangled Banner" at Fenway Park.
Idol fans will find out Wednesday if Tom Lowe made it into the semifinalist round of 24 contestants, but early reports, according to Finke, say he did not advance. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.