

Foes of the military's ''don't ask, don't tell'' policy regarding gay service members hope for better results in their efforts to repeal it in the new Democratic-run Congress.
Democratic representative Martin Meehan of Massachusetts on Wednesday revived legislation aimed at forcing the military to eliminate the policy preventing gay service members from being open about their orientation. Meehan said he expects the House Armed Services panel to hold hearings on the issue.
''I have worked in Congress to fight this policy because I believe that for more than a decade now it has undermined our national security interests,'' Meehan said.
He filed a similar measure that failed in the previous Congress, which was controlled by Republicans. That bill had more than 120 cosponsors, including six Republicans. The new measure has 109 cosponsors.
Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards released a statement in support of Meehan's effort and called it ''an issue of fundamental fairness.''
Republican representative Christopher Shays of Connecticut, who appeared with Meehan at a Capitol Hill news conference, branded the military's policy on gays and lesbians ''foolish and cruel.''
Also attending was retired marine staff sergeant Eric Alva, who lost his leg after stepping on a land mine early in the Iraq war. He was awarded a Purple Heart. ''Who would have ever guessed that the first American wounded was a gay marine,'' Alva said.
Supporters of lifting the restriction on openly gay service members contend that the military—under the strain of fighting two wars—cannot afford to exclude any qualified volunteers.
The current policy, based on legislation passed by Congress in 1993 after fierce debate, states that gays and lesbians may serve in the military only if they keep their sexual orientation private. Commanders may not ask, and gay service members may not tell. Over the years thousands have been dismissed under this policy.
The prospects for Meehan's bill are unclear. While many Democrats have criticized the policy as discriminatory, many Republicans have supported it. Congress may be reluctant to revisit such a divisive issue amid contentious debate over the Iraq war. (Andrew Miga, AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.