
Episcopal bishops meeting privately in Texas have rejected demands from the world's Anglicans that they provide an alternate leader for conservatives who oppose ordaining gays—a move that brings the church to the brink of expulsion from the Anglican Communion.
In the strongest and most direct language yet defending their support for same-sex relationships, the bishops said that accepting a second leader for traditionalists would violate Episcopal church law and the founding principles of the church. ''We cannot accept what would be injurious to the church and could well lead to its permanent division,'' the bishops said in the resolution.
Last month, Anglican leaders emerged from a meeting in Tanzania with an ultimatum for the U.S. denomination. They gave Episcopalians until September 30 to unequivocally pledge not to consecrate another partnered gay bishop or authorize official prayers for same-sex couples. Otherwise, they said, the church risked a much-reduced role in the 77 million–member Anglican Communion.
As part of the plan, the Episcopalians were told to accept a ''primatial vicar'' for conservatives who said they could not accept U.S. presiding bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori because of her acceptance of same-sex relationships and liberal theology.
While the bishops addressed that issue in their resolution, they did not directly stake out a position on the Anglican demand about other gay bishops. However, Episcopal leaders noted that they had previously met requests not to approve another bishop in a same-sex relationship ''at great cost to many, not the least of whom are our gay and lesbian members,'' only to have Anglican leaders say the pledges weren't sufficient.
The resolution expressed the bishops' desire to remain the U.S. representatives of the communion and said there was an ''urgent need'' to meet personally with the Anglican spiritual leader, Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, and the Anglican bishops who advise him.
The Episcopal leaders also acknowledged that their actions could get them kicked out. ''If that means that others reject us and communion with us, as some have already done, we must with great regret and sorrow accept their decision,'' they said.
Anglicans have been debating for years how to interpret Scripture on salvation, truth, and sexuality. Those divisions reached the breaking point in 2003 when Episcopalians consecrated the first openly gay bishop, V. Gene Robinson of New Hampshire. The bishops, meeting near Houston, planned a news conference Wednesday afternoon to explain their decision. (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.