A federal appeals court in Minneapolis has blocked the deportation of a Ugandan woman who was seeking asylum because she was persecuted in her homeland for being a lesbian, sending her case back to the Board of Immigration Appeals for further proceedings.
A three-judge panel of the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals said the BIA misapplied the law and overstepped its authority in the case of Olivia Nabulwala, who sought asylum after the U.S. government tried to deport her for overstaying her visitor's visa.
According to Nabulwala, while she was in Uganda her father became very angry and an aunt physically abused her when she came out to her family while she was in high school. She said she needed hospitalization overnight after a mob attacked a meeting of a lesbian rights group she belonged to while she was attending university in Uganda, and on another occasion two relatives arranged for her to be raped by a stranger. She came to the U.S. in 2001.
Courts have established that gay people can qualify for asylum because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution, the 8th Circuit panel noted.
But the immigration judge in Bloomington, Minn., who handled Nabulwala's case, Joseph Dierkes, denied her application, even though he found her story "generally credible" and said he did not doubt she suffered in Uganda because of her orientation.
The 8th Circuit panel said both the immigration judge and the BIA, which upheld the judge's decision, had misapplied the applicable laws and procedures. It also said the BIA had made findings of fact that it lacked the legal authority to make. The panel ordered the BIA to revisit the case. (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.