

Massachusetts
governor Deval Patrick has issued an order to officials
stating that they must record the marriages of 26
out-of-state gay and lesbian couples whose
marriages were not recognized by former governor Mitt
Romney. On Friday, Ben Clemens, Patrick's chief legal
counsel, ordered the commissioner of the department of
public health, John Auerbach, to "bind and index" the
unions, reports The
Boston
Globe.
The state supreme judicial court ruled in March
2006 that Romney could invoke a law from 1913 to deny
out-of-state couples the right to marry in
Massachusetts if the law in their home state specifically
prohibits same-sex marriages.
As reported by the Globe, same-sex
couples from Rhode Island were the exception to the
rule as they were the only ones allowed to marry in
Massachusetts after a ruling acknowledged last
September that Rhode Island law does not specifically bar
same-sex couples from marrying.
According to Patrick’s office, two of
those 26 couples whose marriages were not
recorded were from Rhode Island.
"It appears like the prior administration was
politicizing a routine administrative function," said
Kyle Sullivan, a spokesman for Patrick. "There was no
legal basis for separating these certificates in the
first place.”
However, Romney spokesman Eric Fernstrom told
the Globe that the former governor was acting on
legal authority when he kept the marriages from being
recorded because Massachusetts law does not recognize
same-sex unions of couples from out of state.
Prior to Patrick's decision, the 26 couples had
already obtained marriage licenses in four towns in
which clerks defied Romney's orders. (The
Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.