
Wade Horn, the
Bush administration's point man for welfare reform, Head
Start, and abstinence education, resigned Monday as
assistant secretary for children and families in the
Department of Health and Human Services.
Horn oversaw a $46 billion budget and 65
programs that serve vulnerable children and families.
He is best known for his work on efforts embraced by
social conservatives, such as more money for faith-based
groups and organizations that work to help couples
improve their marriage.
Republicans gave some of those programs significant funding increases when they were in the majority. For example, Congress set aside for the next five years up to $100 million a year to promote marriage and $50 million a year to produce committed fathers. Similar expansions may be harder to come by with a Democratic majority.
The Senate confirmed Horn in July 2001. He is a child psychologist who served as president of the National Fatherhood Initiative before his nomination by President Bush. The initiative's mission is to increase the proportion of children growing up with responsible fathers.
Horn told his staff Monday that he would be accepting a position in the private sector. His resignation is effective Sunday.
Robert Rector, a senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, said Horn tackled the most important social issue in the United States while others ignored it—the decline of the institution of marriage.
About four in 10 children are born outside of marriage, and those families participate in means-tested assistance programs at much higher rates than do families of married couples, Rector said.
''The government went decade after decade pretending the problem didn't exist,'' Rector said. ''He raised the public profile. He directly addressed it over and over again. He's the first one to do that. Others in this position were frightened away by the issue.''
Others viewed Horn's work more skeptically. Horn oversaw a dramatic increase in funding for abstinence education, which now exceeds $200 million a year. Some groups say it's important to promote abstinence to youths but that that message won't work for all. They would prefer that the Administration fund comprehensive sex education programs, which would include abstinence as part of the curriculum.
''Because [the abstinence funding] is so contrary to public health, our hope is the next assistant secretary there can have a firmer footing on what the evidence says,'' said William Smith, vice president for public policy for the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States. (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.