
.jpg)
In a vote that
did not produce a clear winning side, both parties were
claiming victory in an Alaska referendum that asked voters
to decide if state lawmakers should go forward with a
constitutional amendment that would take away benefits
from the same-sex partners of public employees. With
92% of precincts reporting by Wednesday morning, unofficial
results from the state’s Division of Elections
showed that 55% of voters are in favor of stripping
gay partners of their benefits while 45% are
against it, with those in favor ahead by 8,300 votes,
the Associated Press reports.
"'Get us a constitutional amendment that we can
consider," said Republican representative John
Coghill, who initiated the vote, in regard to the
message that was sent. "So I am going to use that as
forcefully as I can in the legislature to encourage people
to at least get people a chance to vote on [the measure]."
But an opponent of the measure said the result
was decidedly unimpressive. Senate Judiciary Committee
chairman Hollis French, an Anchorage Democrat, said he
does not expect the election to change that.
"It's hardly an
overwhelming result," said French. "The state has now
wasted a million dollars on a poll that isn't going to
change anybody's mind in Juneau." Juneau is the
state capital.
The vote has no binding authority, the AP
reports. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.