
A bill to legalize same-sex marriage in California cleared the assembly judiciary committee on Tuesday, the first step in reaching the desk of a governor who has promised to veto it.
The bill, by Assemblyman Mark Leno of San Francisco, moves on Tuesday's 6–3 vote to the appropriations committee and an expected June vote on the assembly floor.
It mirrors a 2005 bill that passed both legislative houses—a first in in U.S. history—only to be knocked down by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Schwarzenegger has signed some gay-friendly legislation in the past, but this week his office restated his opposition to the bill.
Alice Kessler, director of legislative affairs for Equality California, said her group is working the issue on several fronts.
"We're in talks with the governor's office," Kessler said. "We want him to meet with same-sex couples who will tell him how important this is for families. We are working in the legislature and in the courts." (Last week the California supreme court received briefs for its expected ruling later this year in the city of San Francisco's 2004 marriage-license spree.)
"What we will not do is back down," Kessler added. "We will continue to present this bill to the governor—or another governor—until he will sign it."
The Austrian-born former action star comfortably won reelection in November but is barred from a third term by term limits (and from federal office by his foreign birth).
In his 2005 veto message, Schwarzenegger pointed to an antimarriage initiative approved by California voters five years earlier and said any attempt to legalize same-sex marriage should be decided by voters or the courts.
"I don't want, as governor, to go against the will of the people," he told a student audience in February.
Leno told AP this week that his bill doesn't need voter approval because it would amend a different section of law than Proposition 22, meant to block California from recognizing same-sex marriages performed elsewhere. He said his bill deals with marriages performed in California and defines them as civil contracts between two people. (Barbara Wilcox, The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.