
The Supreme Court on Monday declined to get involved in a dispute between two lesbian former lovers over visitation rights involving a 4-year-old child.
The child's biological mother, Lisa Miller, had asked the justices to take the case because Vermont courts have ordered Miller to allow her former partner, Janet Jenkins, to see the child, Isabella, one week a month.
In 2000 the two women entered into a civil union in Vermont, and they decided Lisa would use artificial insemination with an anonymous donor to have a child.
Isabella was born in Virginia in 2002, and the two women moved to Vermont, where they lived for a year before separating.
Miller renounced her homosexuality, returned to Virginia, and denied Jenkins's demands for visitation rights.
Relying heavily on the rulings by Vermont courts, the Virginia court of appeals said Miller is required to comply with visitation orders of the Vermont courts under the federal Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act.
Miller says the act conflicts with a more recent federal law, the Defense of Marriage Act, on same-sex marriage. That act says no state shall be required to abide by a law of any other state with respect to a same-sex marriage.
In asking the justices to take the case, Miller's lawyers said state courts in Vermont and elsewhere have ''eviscerated the protections afforded each state'' under the Defense of Marriage Act.
Jenkins's lawyers said Vermont courts were the first to take jurisdiction of the case and that Miller's response was to ''run to a Virginia court'' seeking a result more to her liking. (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.