
A Cornell University study found that the brains of people who were geographically closer to a disaster at the time it took place, such as the collapse of the World Trade Center, react more strongly to emotional triggers—even if they otherwise seem to have healed fully.
Researchers found that three years after 9/11, people closer to ground zero tended to still experience lingering symptoms (bad dreams, jumpiness, thinking about the incident, and avoiding the site of the trauma), though they weren't severe enough to be diagnosed as post-traumatic stress disorder or major depression.
Using functional magnetic resonance imaging to see how people's brains responded to photographs of fearful versus calm faces, the scans of 11 people who were within 1.5 miles of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, were compared with those who were living more than 200 miles away at the time; none of the subjects had psychiatric disorders.
"These people appear to be doing OK, but they may indeed be having more sensitive responses to upsetting stimuli," said Elise Temple, a coauthor and assistant professor of human development at Cornell, in a statement.
And the brains of people with lingering symptoms had significantly more emotional reactions when shown photographs of fearful faces. The kinds of changes that these traumas cause in the brain create vulnerability to developing future mental disorders, say the researchers.
As a researcher on one of the first studies to look at the effects of trauma on the brains of healthy people, Temple tells The Advocate that people who experience or witness a hate crime could show similar results. "One of the things we found is an increased fear response in anyone who had experienced trauma. The trauma of a hate crime would be intense and could affect your brain." (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.