
A gay former New Jersey high school student's harassment complaint may go to trial now that state officials have found there is sufficient evidence to allow for such a move, the Asbury Park Press reports.
The state Division on Civil Rights has found "probable cause" for the complaint, Atty. Gen. Stuart Radner said Tuesday, according to the paper. Another key development in the case came earlier this year, when the New Jersey supreme court ruled that the state's antidiscrimination and antiharassment laws apply to students as well as to employees.
The former student, Daniel Jacobson, now 19, says the Jackson Township School District was inadequately responsive to his ongoing complaints of being harassed regularly from 2003 and 2006. He attended Jackson Memorial High School from September 2002 through June 2006.
He said he first notified school officials of the harassment in 2003, saying fellow students were making fun of him for being gay and for being an immigrant from Honduras. Administrators issued warnings and required three students to attend sensitivity training, but the Division of Civil Rights also cited failings in the district's response.
Jacobson said two students shouted an antigay slur at him in front of a guidance counselor, who took no action. He requested a class transfer in November 2005 after a classmate was verbally abusive. In May 2006 he alerted school authorities after receiving a death threat from four other students.
School officials plan to challenge the state's findings, said district spokeswoman Allison Erwin. Erwin claims that state investigators examined documents but never interviewed district employees involved in the case. Division on Civil Rights director J. Frank Vespa-Papaleo said the agency would make a "last-ditch effort" to resolve the matter without a trial, but otherwise it will go to trial, probably before the end of the year.
A ruling against the school district would result in a fine of up to $10,000, and it also could be forced to compensate Jacobson, state officials said. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.