
Police on Sunday arrested a couple who are accused of lying to a Pakistani court about the gender of the husband, who was born female and had sex-reassignment surgery 16 years ago.
The bride's father wants the marriage annulled on the grounds that it is against Islam, but the couple say they married to protect the bride from being sold into marriage to pay off her uncle's gambling debts.
The husband, Shumail Raj, 31, initially went to court seeking protection from harassment by their relatives, but the Lahore high court earlier this month ordered the arrests of Raj and his wife, Shahzina Tariq, 26, for lying to the court.
Raj told the court he is male, but a court-appointed panel of doctors ruled he is a woman. He said his breasts and uterus were surgically removed at age 15 after his voice changed and he began to grow facial hair. But the doctors say he has a vagina that was surgically closed and no penis.
After the couple's arrest on Sunday, Raj told the Associated Press that the surgery made him a man and he married Tariq to save her from the arranged marriage.
''She told me that one of her uncles wants to sell her to pay off a debt,'' Raj said by telephone from a police station in their hometown of Faisalabad.
''I had told Shahzina that I have had two operations and I am not a male. But she said that it was not a problem for her,'' Raj said. He referred to himself as both male and not male during the interview.
His wife said by telephone that she was aware of Raj's surgery and that they married for her protection.
''I knew that Shumail was not a male...but I begged her for protection,'' she said, referring to her husband as a woman throughout the interview.
Aslam Tareen, a senior police officer, said police will wait for orders from the court before further investigating the case, including the claim that Tariq's uncle wanted to sell her into marriage. The couple are scheduled to appear in court Tuesday. (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.