
A court in Lahore, Pakistan, on Monday jailed a same-sex couple for three years for perjury, prompting the defendants to ask the president for help.
The case of Shumail Raj, who was born female but had two operations to remove her breasts and uterus 16 years ago, and Shahzina Tariq has made waves by raising issues of homosexuality and transsexuality that are taboo in this conservative Muslim society.
The couple, who married last year, had approached the Lahore high court for protection against harassment by Tariq's relatives. However, the judge accused them of lying about the biological sex of Raj, 31.
Court-appointed doctors examined Raj and decided she was still a woman—something the couple acknowledged later in court. Raj has expressed a desire to go abroad for further surgery.
Presiding judge Kahawaja Mohammed Sharif, announcing their conviction for perjury, said he was issuing a ''lenient'' sentence, below the seven-year maximum, because they had apologized.
The judge also fined them $165 and dropped a charge of committing an act of unnatural lust, which can be punished by life in prison.
Raj and Tariq, 26, appeared shocked by the verdict.
The pair's eyes widened as Sharif announced their punishment, and they briefly clasped each other's arms before police led them away.
Defense attorney Zahid Husain Bilal said the couple would appeal and that they hoped for acquittal.
''They were not alerted at any stage of the proceedings that they could be penalized,'' Bilal said.
Raj, wearing a short-sleeved white shirt and jeans, urged Afghanistan's president, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, to step in.
''We appeal to President Musharraf to intervene,'' Raj told reporters outside the court. ''Musharraf is talking about moderation and enlightenment. We hope he will do something for us.''
Asked about the prospect of three years in different jails for women, she said: ''No matter, no matter. We love each other.''
Tariq, wearing a dark veil, said nothing as the two got into a waiting police van and drove away.
The court will resume hearings on June 22 on whether to annul the couple's marriage, which Tariq's family says contravenes Islam as well as Pakistani laws against same-sex unions.
The couple initially said that they wed to protect Tariq from being sold into marriage to pay off her uncle's gambling debts. They later admitted they had lied about Raj's sex because they were in love and wanted to live together.
The judge on Monday ordered police to open a criminal investigation against the surgeons who operated on Raj and detail their findings at the June hearing. (Asif Shahzad, AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.