
A resolution to ban discrimination at ExxonMobil based on sexual orientation failed at the oil giant's annual meeting May 30 in Dallas. The proposal—which 37.7% of shareholders approved, falling short of the necessary majority—was presented by the New York City Employees’ Retirement System and the city's Fire Department Pension Fund.
This is the seventh resolution New York City Comptroller William C. Thompson has filed to the ExxonMobil board requesting the policy change on behalf of the two funds. According to the statement, shareholder support for the proposal has increased in each of the seven years; it was supported by 34.6% of shareholders in 2006 and 29.4% in 2005.
“While it is heartening that a number of shareholders agree that ExxonMobil must take steps to provide equal protections for all employees, it is extremely troubling and downright unacceptable that ExxonMobil has strongly resisted the call,” Thompson said in a statement. “We must remain steadfast in our efforts to bring about change and urge ExxonMobil to establish equal rights in the workplace.”
The Unitarian Church, one of the resolution’s cosponsors, presented the measure at the meeting in November 2006. The Pension Fund and the Employees' Retirement System have a combined $2 billion, or 25 million shares, invested in the oil behemoth.
According to the Human Rights Campaign, ExxonMobil has been left behind in protecting their LGBT employees, as industry competitors Amerada Hess, BP, ChevronTexaco, ConocoPhillips, Shell, and Sunoco have all drafted policies doing so. ExxonMobil is also the only Fortune 50 company that has failed to write sexual orientation protections into its primary nondiscrimination policy. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.