

In their debate Sunday night in Manchester, N.H., Democratic presidential candidates clashed on Iraq and over the security of the country since the September 11, 2001, terror attacks—but they were united in their opposition to "don't ask, don't tell."
All the candidates raised their hands when asked by moderator Wolf Blitzer if they would get rid of the ''don't ask, don't tell'' policy on gays in the military instituted by President Clinton.
Was it a mistake? Clinton said her husband's 1993 formulation ''was a transition policy,'' but one that is no longer valid.
She said it is being ''implemented in a discriminatory manner'' and has been used to discharge Arabic linguists when such translators are in short supply.
On the Iraq war, former North Carolina senator John Edwards, trailing both New York senator Hillary Rodham Clinton and Illinois senator Barack Obama in national polls, criticized their cautious approach in forcing President Bush to withdraw troops from Iraq.
While some members of Congress spoke out ''loudly and clearly'' last month against legislation to pay for the war through September but without a withdrawal timetable, ''others did not,'' Edwards said.
''They went quietly to the floor of the Senate, cast the right vote. But there is a difference between leadership and legislating,'' Edwards told his rivals during the second Democratic debate.
Both Clinton and Obama voted against the bill, which passed, but without making a strong case against the legislation.
''I think it's obvious who I'm talking about,'' Edwards said.
Clinton disagreed with Edwards, both in his comments on her role on Iraq and in his characterization of Bush's global war on terrorism as a ''political slogan, a bumper sticker.''
As a New Yorker, ''I have seen firsthand the terrible damage that can be inflicted on our country by a small band of terrorists,'' Clinton said.
Still, she said, ''I believe we are safer than we were.''
At the conclusion of the two-hour debate, the candidates were asked what their top priority would be for their first 100 days in office:
--Edwards: ''travel the world'' and ''reestablish America's moral authority.''
--Clinton: bring home U.S. troops from Iraq.
--Obama: bring home U.S. troops and push for national health care.
--New Mexico governor Bill Richardson: upgrade U.S. schools and push a $40,000-a-year minimum wage for teachers.
--Delaware senator Joe Biden: end the war in Iraq and defuse tensions with Iran and North Korea.
--Ohio representative Dennis Kucinich: help ''reshape the world for peace'' and end all nuclear weapons.
--Former Alaska senator Mike Gravel: Remind congressional leaders they can end the war in Iraq now.
--Connecticut senator Chris Dodd: ''Restore constitutional rights in this country.''
The candidates sought to highlight their own differences on the war in Iraq.
Obama told Edwards, who voted in October 2002 to authorize the war in Iraq but now says that the vote was a mistake: ''John, you're about 4 1/2 years late on leadership on this issue.''
Obama was not in the Senate at the time of the vote but had voiced opposition to the war resolution at the time.
Edwards conceded, ''He was right, I was wrong'' on opposing the war from the beginning. And Edwards sought to highlight his change of heart on his vote with Clinton's continuing refusal to disavow her vote for the war resolution.
Said Clinton: ''That was a sincere vote.''
She again declined to say her vote was wrong.
Kucinich said the war on Iraq should not just be blamed on Bush but on the Congress that authorized it.
U.S. troops ''never should have been sent there in the first place,'' he said. Rather than debate timetables and benchmarks, the Democratic-controlled Congress should ''just say no money, the war's over,'' he said.
To a question on whether English should be the official language in the United States, only former Alaska senator Mike Gravel raised his hand in the affirmative.
But Obama protested the question itself, calling it ''the kind of question that was designed precisely to divide us.'' He said such questions ''do a disservice to the American people.''
Asked what role former president Clinton would play in a new Democratic White House, Senator Clinton said, ''Bill Clinton, my dear husband, would be sent around the world as a roving ambassador.''
Obama ducked the question. Richardson said he would send the former president to the Middle East as a peace envoy. Gravel said he would use him as a traveling goodwill ambassador. ''He can take his wife with him, she'll still be in the Senate,'' Gravel said to laughter.
Edwards also challenged Obama, who recently unveiled his health care plan, on the need for universal coverage. Edwards was the first Democratic candidate to offer a proposal and he complained that Obama's plan falls short of offering universal coverage.
Candidates also split on ways to pressure the government of Sudan to end violence in its Darfur region, where more than 200,000 people have been killed in four years of fighting between local rebels and government forces.
Richardson suggested leaning on China, up to a possible threatened boycott of the 2008 summer Olympics, to pressure Sudan to allow in more U.N. peacekeepers.
Clinton declined to say whether she would use military force in Darfur, saying she didn't want to ''talk about these hypotheticals.''
The candidates squared off as a new national poll found Clinton maintaining a significant lead over her rivals. The Washington Post/ABC News poll found the former first lady leading the field with 42% support among adults, compared with 27% for Obama and 11% for Edwards.
CNN, WMUR-TV, and The New Hampshire Union Leader presented the debate. (Beth Fouhy, AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.