

Kalamazoo, Mich., will become the state’s first public employer to revoke domestic-partnership benefits in the wake of a 2004 state vote amending the state constitution to ban same-sex marriage. Kalamazoo city manager Kenneth Collard, citing an order from the state supreme court, confirmed that the partners of four nonunionized city employees will lose their benefits effective June 30. According to the Battle Creek Enquirer, the Michigan supreme court agreed to hear an appeal of a ruling that blocked same-sex partner benefits, but Kalamazoo has decided not to wait and is repealing the partner benefits.
The employees were told a month in advance to find new health coverage, the article said.
The Ann Arbor school district will follow suit by not including domestic-partner benefits in future union contracts. About 15 school district faculty and staff members are entitled to benefits under their current contracts, but the benefits will not be included with their renewed contracts. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.